News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by lucumo on Thursday June 25, 2026 @05:31AM (#48671078)
> There is no reason for any employee to not search for unionization.

That's a very theoretical view. (As most absolutes are.)

Unions and rules around unions can be very different depending on locality, industry and other specifics. The power and benefits a union gives a specific employee may not outweigh the cost they impose on that specific employee.

Furthermore, unions are organizations. They have their own internal power structures that can be corrupted by self-serving individuals or special interests. A blanket "union = good" view can make that invisible to you.

Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by aaa_aaa on Thursday June 25, 2026 @05:55AM (#48671233)
In one of my previous work, I was "forced" to enter a public union. They were simply leeches sucking government money (surprise, government was paying union premiums) through workers with almost no actual benefits. Whenever somebody glorifies Unions I just chukle.
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by tovej on Thursday June 25, 2026 @06:14AM (#48671349)
Was this in the US? In the US, anti-union action by the government and employers has been extra egregious historically. This has obviously impacted unions in the US.

There's also LOTS of anti-union misinformation spreading in the US.

Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by aaa_aaa on Thursday June 25, 2026 @08:28AM (#48672369)
No it was not in US
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by LanceH on Thursday June 25, 2026 @01:03PM (#48676301)
There is lots of pro-union misinformation as well.
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by tovej on Friday June 26, 2026 @03:25AM (#48683453)
Please. Share.
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by one33seven on Thursday June 25, 2026 @06:22AM (#48671416)
So your point is, you have to look for a good union? Fully agreed!
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by eru on Thursday June 25, 2026 @08:06AM (#48672185)
The top level command suggested that any unionisation is good. Even with a terrible union.
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by lucumo on Thursday June 25, 2026 @08:55AM (#48672650)
Almost. My point is that you have to see if a union is good (for you).
Re:Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking ... by gs17 on Thursday June 25, 2026 @08:10PM (#48680855)
In the US, you don't really get an option to choose. At most you'll get "paying union dues to the only one, or not", often you don't get that much.