Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by lstodd on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:22PM
(#48667661)
Would you like to work in the middle of nowhere?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by SoftTalker on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:52PM
(#48667867)
After construction, not all that many people work at a data center. Some ops staff, maybe a small security team.
Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by lstodd on Thursday June 25, 2026 @11:41AM
(#48675099)
So let's spit on those 'not so many people' from our ivory tower?
Besides, it's not about people, it's about power. Pulling a few MW into middle of nowhere is prohibitively expensive.
Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by CamperBob2 on Thursday June 25, 2026 @12:45AM
(#48669015)
If they can be deployed in low-earth orbit with nobody working on them, they can be deployed 20 miles east of Bumfuck, Nebraska with nobody working on them.
Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by cameron_b on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:08AM
(#48672774)
The physical threat model of the Nebraska option does not rely on the tyranny of the rocket to keep intruders away.
Re:Nvidia's 45°C cooling design cuts data center water use t...
by CamperBob2 on Thursday June 25, 2026 @10:39PM
(#48681748)
The point is that if you don't put them in the middle of somebody's neighborhood, nobody will care to attack them.
The idea of building robust, lightly-staffed technical facilities in obscure places all over the country is nothing even remotely new. It's how the long-distance telephone network was constructed and successfully operated in the decades before satellites took over: https://telephoneworld.org/long-distance-companies/att-long-...