Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by DanielHB on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:46AM
(#48659759)
Sam Altman is not an AI researcher, I don't think he ever worked directly with tech as an engineer either. Pure MBA-with-engineering-degree type.
Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by mschild on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:31AM
(#48659525)
> He is connected and gives money to people
Thats why. Not that we should listen to him (no clue who exactly he is) but thats why he gets attention.
Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by dwa3592 on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:45AM
(#48659745)
>>He is connected and gives money to people
this is also known as influence so..
Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by mrhottakes on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @11:05AM
(#48661086)
All that Zuck, Altman, Musk, etc do is give money to people
Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by N_Lens on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:33AM
(#48659544)
Sir this is Capitalism.
Re:Reid Hoffman says SpaceX 'not an AI company', xAI 'comple...
by otterley on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @09:29AM
(#48659493)
I truthfully don’t know the answer, but if I had to guess, his connections and positions provide him with an unusual amount of knowledge and perspective. Another might be that his opinions often are correct in hindsight.
He is connected and gives money to people - why should that mean anyone should listen to him about any of this. He's not actually a do-er is he?
Is there something I am missing? The amount of coverage he gets seems massively disproportionate to his skill, talent and insight.