News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CloudFront vs CloudFlare by TazeTSchnitzel on Saturday December 01, 2012 @07:56PM (#4859631)
A lot of these comments seem misinformed. So, as a user of CloudFlare, let me speak:

CloudFlare takes over your domain and reverse proxies your site, to your control. They cache resources for you, selectively, to your complete control. They have some security features, like presenting captchas to dodgy IPs. The base service is completely free, albeit restrictive, but there are no bandwidth caps. They also have "apps" that provide extra features, like asynchronous JS loading, automatically adding Google Analytics to every page, email scrambling, etc. Everything is customisable - if you want, you can completely disable the security features, caching, apps, in fact, you can also disable the reverse proxying for subdomains (which of course removes all the CF benefits).

My web app, http://ponyplace.ajf.me/, has benefited greatly from being on CloudFlare, since it has relieved the burden of serving most static content from my server. It's a really great service, especially for the price. My only complaint is that SSL usage on CloudFlare is pretty pricey.

Re:CloudFront vs CloudFlare by latchkey on Saturday December 01, 2012 @08:29PM (#4859712)
What do you mean by SSL usage? I pay $20/mo for the 'Pro' plan which is less expensive than Google AppEngine pricing (my other option).
Re:CloudFront vs CloudFlare by TazeTSchnitzel on Sunday December 02, 2012 @04:11AM (#4860648)
But that means you can't encrypt the reverse proxy connection, IIRC.