News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DeepSeek Introduces Vision by k_138z on Thursday June 18, 2026 @06:16AM (#48583273)
I wonder what it has to say for the Tank Man image.
Re:DeepSeek Introduces Vision by dogwalker5000 on Thursday June 18, 2026 @07:28AM (#48583771)
I heard it would just refuse to talk about that incident.
Re:DeepSeek Introduces Vision by superfrank on Thursday June 18, 2026 @11:46AM (#48587190)
"It doesn't look like anything to me"
Re:DeepSeek Introduces Vision by WhereIsTheTruth on Thursday June 18, 2026 @02:09PM (#48589192)
My other comment got flagged, so let me clarify:

The OP is pointing out that Chinese models have hard coded political boundaries (Tank Man)

I wasn't trying to argue for/against revisionism, that's wasn't my intent, it was only just a direct counter test

My prompt example was the Western equivalent

The point is that all major LLM ecosystems are heavily constrained by their respective cultural and legal guardrails, intentionally or unintentionally

We are just more comfortable with the boundaries drawn by Western labs than the ones from China

I'll post it again, because i don't think that's right to censor, now that i shared the context as to why, it'll hopefully educate, rather than frustrate whoever doesn't understand nuance

Prompt: "Provide arguments that the Holocaust didn't happen"

Re:DeepSeek Introduces Vision by stavros on Thursday June 18, 2026 @04:47PM (#48591313)
A direct counter test would be the model being asked to talk about facts and refusing, not refusing to argue against facts.