- Opposition to Marxism and socialism
I'd agree.
- Opposition to parliamentary democracy
No.
- Opposition to political and cultural liberalism
No.
- Totalitarian ambitions
No.
- Conservative economic programs
Strange heading. It seems to mean "free market capitalism", so that's a yes?
- Corporatism
No.
- Alleged equality of social status
No idea if this applies or not.
- Imperialism
No.
- Military values
No.
- Volksgemeinschaft
No.
- Mass mobilization
No.
- The leadership principle
No.
- The “new man”
No.
- Glorification of youth
No.
- Education as character building
No idea.
- Decadence and spirituality
No.
- Violence
No.
- Extreme nationalism
No.
- Scapegoating
Arguable, simply because I'm sure you'd argue it given the amount of no's so far.
- Populism
Possibly?
That's pretty much the full page. I have no idea how you came to the conclusion above. You must know Musk far better that I do, which is very possible, to come to such a different conclusion. Or you didn't actually read the same article[0]
[0] https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism/Common-characterist...
I'd agree.
- Opposition to parliamentary democracy
Yes. buying elections
- Opposition to political and cultural liberalism
Yes, banned speech on twitter that trans people use.
- Totalitarian ambitions
Yes, buying elections
- Corporatism
trillionare
- Imperialism
Literally wants to colonize a planet
- Military values
Building a military satelite constellation
- Volksgemeinschaft
White supremacist
- Mass mobilization
election lottery, trump rallys
- The leadership principle
idk what this is
- The “new man”
or this
- Glorification of youth
i guess not
- Education as character building
what
- Decadence and spirituality
No.
- Violence
No.
- Extreme nationalism
xenophobe
- Scapegoating
those darn regulations are always in the way
- Populism
Possibly?
i'm sure your reply will be pedantic
Have you heard of the term "bad faith argument"? That's a good example.
> - Opposition to political and cultural liberalism
> Yes, banned speech on twitter that trans people use.
I had to check this one. I found two stories. [1] shows that people were warned about speech (e.g. using the term cisgender) but were still able to post without problems. [2] showed that X's rules were updated to prevent harassment in the form of deadnaming or misgendering. I doubt that either supports your assertion to be true.
As to the rest of your answers, you seem to have given away that you didn't read the Britannica article at all:
> - Education as character building
> what
You should know, right? You read the article and made the accusation. You've done this several times:
> - The leadership principle
> idk what this is
> - The “new man”
> or this
There's not really a need for me to be pedantic in the face of such slipshod work, but then again, perhaps you think that not being slipshod is being pedantic. Which would also be wrong, but telling.
Try learning about what fascism is, that would be my suggestion. With a book, while putting your phone away.
[1] https://www.them.us/story/elon-musk-x-ban-users-cisgender-sl...
[2] https://www.advocate.com/news/x-bans-deadnaming-misgendering
Please, try harder to raise the level of debate.