How four Microsoft engineers proved that the “darknet” would defeat DRM

Re:How four Microsoft engineers proved that the “darknet” wo... by TheAmazingIdiot on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:08PM (#4855452)

(I posted this a month ago)

How do you know, if you are that you are indeed breaking DRM vs just doing complicated stuff with a firmware?

It seems obvious if there's PKI in there somewhere. But aside that, how do you tell the difference?

Might I add that the old proposed "Broadcast Flag" would have been a bit in the HDTV stream to signal no_copy. Changing that bit would have broken the DMCA.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How four Microsoft engineers proved that the “darknet” wo... by Natsu on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:49PM (#4855650)

BnetD managed to violate the DMCA merely by being unable to emulate the authorization layer.

https://www.eff.org/cases/blizzard-v-bnetd

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How four Microsoft engineers proved that the “darknet” wo... by bediger4000 on Friday November 30, 2012 @08:02PM (#4856379)

Oddities like that render "intellectual property" useless. Since copyright (in the USA) lasts for life-of-author + 70 years, or 90 years for corporate authorship, you can't tell on the face of some information whether it is "property" or not. You need to know when/if the author died.

[ Parent | on HN ]