Re:Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of...
by rbanffy on Tuesday June 16, 2026 @05:41AM
(#48552803)
> But large businesses would rather really prefer if you continued to believe they pay +88% just like you. That way they get to point at the government while keeping their fat margins.
And, in the meantime, they help push for more "grift-friendly" politicians. For them, it's a win-win situation.
Re:Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of...
by matheusmoreira on Tuesday June 16, 2026 @10:41PM
(#48565097)
> 60% (II) with 18% (ICMS) on top for a total of +88%
Nope. ICMS is calculated "por dentro". It's base / (1 - rate), not base * rate.
Product = 100
II = 60
= 160
ICMS total = 160 / (1 - 0.18)
= 195.12
ICMS = 195.12 - 160
= 35.12
That's +95.12% tax. Also known as nearly 100% tax. One for me, one for the government.> The tariffs for commercial importations are much lower and depend on the part.
Fair point, but they're sure as hell not "much" lower. As you yourself noted, they are still high, and obviously those companies are going to want to add their own margins on top.
The tariffs for commercial importations are much lower and depend on the part. For SSDs, for example, II is around 10%. With other fees and ICMS, you're looking at around +60% total. Still high, but not nearly as high.
But large businesses would rather really prefer if you continued to believe they pay +88% just like you. That way they get to point at the government while keeping their fat margins.