No, everyone is not using AI for everything

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by monkpit on Sunday June 14, 2026 @03:20PM (#48531528)

You can be dismissive all you want, but the point is to acknowledge you don’t understand everyone’s situation and you can’t make sweeping generalizations like “I did it and I can judge you if you _didn’t_ do it”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by d_silin on Sunday June 14, 2026 @03:51PM (#48531886)

Goes both way, yes.

History has examples of extremely underprivileged people not compromising on the values even when facing death or torture.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by inigyou on Sunday June 14, 2026 @05:19PM (#48532852)

That value usually isn't not telling white lies of no importance in a job interview.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by d_silin on Sunday June 14, 2026 @05:41PM (#48533086)

When does it stop, though?

A white lie during interview, a deadline you promised and knew you could not deliver? A product you ship that claims to do X, but it doesn't?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by inigyou on Sunday June 14, 2026 @06:18PM (#48533451)

All's fair in business and war.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No, everyone is not using AI for everything by account42 on Monday June 15, 2026 @09:48AM (#48541239)

You can also acknowledge that most people abandon their principles long before they are anywhere close to starving and will not be harmed (physically) by being reminded of that.

[ Parent | on HN ]