Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by pjc50 on Friday June 12, 2026 @05:54AM
(#48501993)
I wonder why people are more eager to pool money to pay a corporate-owned computer to build things than to the actual humans who have been building open source for decades? Much of which has ended up in the training set?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by eptcyka on Friday June 12, 2026 @06:04AM
(#48502074)
Humans are more expensive.
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by delijati on Friday June 12, 2026 @08:51AM
(#48503497)
Humans can also use LLM's even a local LLM
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by vntok on Friday June 12, 2026 @12:08PM
(#48505901)
That's even more expensive.
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by KeplerBoy on Friday June 12, 2026 @06:39AM
(#48502323)
LLM output is just very predictable. If you spend 200$ on that /goal you will get some output. It may or may not work perfectly, but there will be a repo with some progress. If you specced the goal well and it is feasible, a decent model will most likely get you decent progress.
Also who would take on any of these projects for a meager 200$? Most of that stuff is borderline interesting, clearly not interesting enough for the people proposing the things to start working on them themselves.
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by nullbio on Friday June 12, 2026 @08:35AM
(#48503338)
Exactly. This screams crowdfunding for AI labs. Who made this? Someone at Anthropic?
Re:Show HN: FablePool – pool money behind a prompt, and Fabl...
by sanreds on Friday June 12, 2026 @10:09AM
(#48504329)
Fablepool spends Anthropic's inference budget and puts the output under MIT, thats not growing Anthropic's moat, its commoditizing it. Anthropic just sells the API calls either way.