Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Thursday June 11, 2026 @02:13PM
(#48494248)
This is a pretty reasonable statement and I'm not sure how you could interpret this as "sucking up to the admin."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by CamperBob2 on Thursday June 11, 2026 @02:15PM
(#48494285)
It's a pretty reasonable statement if you work for Anthropic and are eyeing your stock options nervously and your competitors even more so.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Thursday June 11, 2026 @02:44PM
(#48494689)
Everyone that isn't a bitter cynic must be a shill.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by senordevnyc on Thursday June 11, 2026 @10:51PM
(#48499299)
I’ve noticed that too many HN folks seem to think that cynicism makes them more intelligent. I think it must be some kind of insecurity, about not wanting to be seen as naive or something. It’s pretty sad though, I wonder how some of these people find any peace or joy in their lives.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Friday June 12, 2026 @12:27AM
(#48499918)
It's a very common failure mode amongst the chronically online. It's a way for people to feel superior over others - really, they're just depriving themselves of joy and the idea that good things can and do exist in the world.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by lbreakjai on Friday June 12, 2026 @01:53PM
(#48507286)
Believing they have any interests other than theirs at heart is like believing the stripper is really in love with you. That's not cynicism, that's just common sense.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by senordevnyc on Friday June 12, 2026 @04:25PM
(#48509066)
Do you feel really smart now?
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by ben_w on Thursday June 11, 2026 @06:25PM
(#48497241)
I can read it as both TBH.
First sentence by itself is mundane "regulators are good", which most people agree with, and also libertarians will object to regardless of leader.
Second sentence is obviously sucking up, though is the same level of sucking up found on every stereotypical LinkedIn post.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by jbm on Thursday June 11, 2026 @07:43PM
(#48497940)
No one is "grateful" for being labelled a security risk. The statement reads more like a Chinese "Ah Q" story than a real response.
(Unless they are piping the F1 Mercedes theme song in the announce system at anthropic, in which case maybe you are right)
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by solenoid0937 on Friday June 12, 2026 @12:26AM
(#48499906)
But they aren't talking about being labeled a security risk. The scope of this paragraph is narrow and refers specifically to the executive order.