News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Fable 5 by simonw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @08:59AM (#48475647)
Anthropic didn't give me early access to this model, shouldn't that bias me against it?
Re:Claude Fable 5 by deagle50 on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @10:46AM (#48477109)
You kinda proved the point...
Re:Claude Fable 5 by simonw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @11:05AM (#48477467)
How?
Re:Claude Fable 5 by deagle50 on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @12:18PM (#48478613)
If you're that easily biased then why trust your assessment?
Re:Claude Fable 5 by simonw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @12:27PM (#48478739)
Where did I say I was biased?
Re:Claude Fable 5 by deagle50 on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @01:49PM (#48480025)
the hypothetical you presented above
Re:Claude Fable 5 by simonw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @01:51PM (#48480064)
It was a hypothetical. How does presenting a hypothetical equate to proving anyone's point here?
Re:Claude Fable 5 by deagle50 on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @06:53PM (#48483904)
you implied that not being given early access could bias you in the other direction. Which in my opinion would demonstrate that you are easily biased. Which would then call into question any opinion you share about the subject.
Re:Claude Fable 5 by simonw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @07:21PM (#48484142)
Someone accused me of being biased in favor of model providers who give me early access, after I praised Fable's performance.

I said "Anthropic didn't give me early access to this model, shouldn't that bias me against it?"

I was explicitly pointing out that their failure to give me early access had not, in this case, lead to me reviewing their model poorly.

I try very hard not to let things like early access affect my reviews of models. I was hoping this particular situation could help illustrate that.

Re:Claude Fable 5 by munksbeer on Thursday June 11, 2026 @03:35AM (#48487438)
Don't feed the trolls Simon.