Re:Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwo...
by johnisgood on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @09:23AM
(#48460820)
If I vibe code a project, that involves docs and tests as well. Obviously I do not, at any point, do anything blindly and there are some iterations for everything. I always double-check, and I do not use "agents", I do everything manually. I always check what the LLM is thinking, in real-time. I might be old school, but that allows me to write code that is not a pile of shit. :P I am still conscious about quality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwo...
by whattheheckheck on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @12:52PM
(#48463694)
Anecdotal.
13 million swe roles with .01% is 130,000 compromised devices.
Process problem
Re:Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwo...
by johnisgood on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @04:28PM
(#48467247)
I think that the numerical example you gave appears to be wrong unless you intended 1% rather than 0.01%.
In any case, fair enough. The concern is that organizations will build processes around AI where many people do not review outputs carefully. I do not disagree with this.
I also agree that my particular workflow is anecdotal and does not work at scale.
Re:Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwo...
by whattheheckheck on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @11:08PM
(#48470917)
Yes my bad I even checked it in the calculator but then typed in .01 again but added % again. I meant to do it to serve as an example of how bad humans are at thing.... right...
Yes 1%
Re:Microsoft's open source tools were hacked to steal passwo...
by johnisgood on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @03:26AM
(#48472735)
I do agree.