News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by miltonlost on Monday June 08, 2026 @12:31PM (#48447515)
Public parks should not be developed on for the sake of the community. We need wild areas.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by triceratops on Monday June 08, 2026 @12:52PM (#48447809)
We need wild areas in the community? Why? Let the wild be in the wild.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by childofhedgehog on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:38PM (#48448455)
Having natural spaces within communities is vital for mental health. For example, Central Park in NYC is a vital resource for the city allowing people to enjoy nature close to home. Kids need places to go and play. Adults need space to recreate. Pets need space too. Why would you want to have no green spaces within your community?
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by triceratops on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:43PM (#48448525)
Central Park isn't wild. I replied to someone who said we need more wild areas. I'm all for parks.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by jmalicki on Monday June 08, 2026 @04:34PM (#48451557)
There is a huge gradation of "how wild".

Central park is way more wild than a playground, which is way more wild than a city street corner.

The Yosemite National Park front country is way more wild than Central Park.

The federally-protected wilderness areas, where it is illegal to use a chainsaw for trail management as that is not sufficiently wild, in the Sierra Nevadas are even more wild, but still have a ton of people, trails etc.

The Brooks Range in Alaska is yet even more wild - no/few trails, take a bush plane in/out, etc.

Allowing a bit more wilderness is always a utility - it doesn't have to be binary wild/not wild (and very little land habitable by humans has ever not been severely influenced by humans)

Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by dylan604 on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:05PM (#48447988)
It's farm land. Sounds pretty wild to me. Also, we have wild land set up as parks as in national/state parks. A park doesn't have to mean slides/swings and a bunch of ankle biters running around.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by freak42 on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:19PM (#48448165)
Farm land isn't wild.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by dylan604 on Monday June 08, 2026 @02:00PM (#48448785)
Once you stop farming it, it'll be wild right quick. Not really sure why you're quibbling this way. Ahh, maybe it's because your just a bot
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by PsylentKnight on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:36PM (#48448424)
Because people want/need accessible parks? Texas in particular has relatively very little parkland compared to its size, and its population-to-park ratio is getting increasingly out of whack
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by triceratops on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:37PM (#48448437)
I thought parks aren't wild.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by freak42 on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:19PM (#48448159)
There is less and less wild left over.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by triceratops on Monday June 08, 2026 @01:27PM (#48448296)
It won't be very wild sitting in the midst of a human settlement.
Re:A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Bu... by antisthenes on Monday June 08, 2026 @02:47PM (#48449657)
It just depends on the size. I know of several 1000+ acre parks that would be essentially considered wild areas with the exception of a few hiking paths.

They are full of wildlife ranging from small rodents to bears.