Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made

Re:Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made by steno132 on Friday June 05, 2026 @04:56PM (#48418167)

Take a example. You could be a hunter gatherer, you could grow all your own crops from scratch, you could forsake all modern medicine and rely on superstition - would you be considered a wise person? You figured out things a lot of people didn't, you took the harder road - but most people would say this approach is just dumb.

What's wise isn't forsaking technology, it's using technology to improve things, and developing new technology as well. What's wise is using AI as a power user and seeing how you can contribute to the intelligence age.

Celebrating a foregone past where human intelligence was more valuable is hopeless and naive at best.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made by happytoexplain on Friday June 05, 2026 @05:03PM (#48418248)

That's not an example, it's an analogy. I don't see the value in shifting the conversation to identifying all the differences in an (extremely removed) analogy. It's rhetorically low-quality.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made by recursive on Friday June 05, 2026 @05:01PM (#48418218)

Different people value different things. Some people run even though they could have taken a Waymo. Some people are into paperclipmaxxing. I avoid AI to the extent that it's easy and practical, but I don't do it to call myself wise. I just don't like it. Am I being inefficient? Possibly. There are some things I do where I'm not optimizing for KPI though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made by MattRix on Friday June 05, 2026 @05:01PM (#48418224)

Do you think it would be a good thing if all music (for example) was made with AI and not by humans? What a lot of people in tech right now don’t seem to get is that art is about how it transforms the artist, not just the final product.

[ Parent | on HN ]