News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P by themafia on Friday June 05, 2026 @12:11AM (#48407828)
> They’re meant to communicate some metric about the market.

Is that why people spend time, money and effort creating and maintaining them? They're just broadcasters? That seems dubious.

Re:SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P by JumpCrisscross on Friday June 05, 2026 @12:16AM (#48407845)
> Is that why people spend time, money and effort creating and maintaining them? They're just broadcasters?

Yes. There are more indices than there are stocks. Publishing an index is, business wise, a game of getting funds to license them.

Re:SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P by fragmede on Friday June 05, 2026 @01:11AM (#48408234)
I mean, they get paid for it, sometimes quite a lot, for this "broadcasting". $100mm of AUM gets you like $200k profit/yr. (Like $500k minus fees)
Re:SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P by mamonster on Friday June 05, 2026 @03:55AM (#48409396)
Once you have an index, you can offer all sorts of products around it.

-You can offer a return swap to an investor so he can "invest" in the index. You can alternatively build a whole list of derivatives and products around it and offer them to investors instead (think Itraxx,Vix,etc)

-A fund manager can use it as his benchmark and you get to see if he is good or not.

-If its a factor index you can now use it for risk management and return attribution.

The key thing today is that creating a new index that isn't a fad is very hard. There has also been a lot of consolidation of indices into few players (SP, MSCI, Bloomberg) as it's obviously an economies of scale business.