Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ...
by bombcar on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @10:24PM
(#48392891)
Mythos turns out to be Opus 4.8 in a trenchcoat with guardrails removed.
Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ...
by satvikpendem on Thursday June 04, 2026 @01:17AM
(#48394263)
Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are well known to be distilled versions of Mythos unlike 4.6 which is why they are rated so badly by users compared to 4.6.
Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ...
by Khaine on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @10:02PM
(#48392744)
I would find a blog post on this really interesting.
Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ...
by ramblin_prose on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @11:32PM
(#48393406)
I'd like to read that blog please! Thanks for the insight.
If you begin a generic reverse engineering task, 30+ tool calls in a row. The moment it sees something it doesn’t like, token burn, single tool calls iteration, “This is a known CTF challenge, I can proceed”, single tool calls iteration, “This is a real CTF challenge, I can proceed”, etc.
It’s heavily neutered now, without changing the model, and you pay for the privilege and don’t notice.
The end result of course being that it both expensive and useless for approved CTF tasks. No one is using Opus for security. If they think it’s working, the harsh reality is they’re not doing security work; they’re just generically finding bugs.
I do this for a job and can demonstrate this plain as day, dump the injected prompt, and notice what it’s doing isn’t security work, it just looks like it. Happy to write a blog about it if you want to know more. Apparently many people think it’s working for them when it absolutely isn’t.