He wanted to remain together just for the children. It's pretty safe to conclude he would not have done so if he had no children and that her presence is detrimental to him in some fashion. The terms listed are harsh, but they reflect his priorities quite well. Calling him a jerk is a bit out of line when he's prioritizing his children highly enough to try being a father when that isn't his most important goal.

His most important goal doesn't appear to have been his children, but rather his work.

What a horrible way to argue. So the thought "the evidence might not be sufficient" never comes to your mind? Uncritical thinking like this ("knee jerk reactions") are one of the banes of humanity.

I wasn't suggesting the OP's argument was fact. I'm simply suggesting one counters the argument by backing their own up.

I think the down votes are a little harsh.

stickfigure is arguing that TFA isn't necessarily evidence that supports the judgment in question.