News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it ... by ryandrake on Saturday May 30, 2026 @01:09PM (#48338488)
An optimist can hope AI and robotics brings us into a post-scarcity world and that society responds with utopia rather than just disposing of the 99% of people who become economically irrelevant. History has a pessimistic vibe though.
Re:To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it ... by skeledrew on Saturday May 30, 2026 @01:50PM (#48338896)
A pessimist would preempt the disposal of that 99% by ensuring the 1% doesn't monopolize AI and robotics. By whatever means necessary.
Re:To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it ... by senordevnyc on Saturday May 30, 2026 @01:30PM (#48338683)
History has the most optimistic vibe imaginable, what are you talking about?? Look at where we are as a species right now, vs century ago, a millennium ago, ten thousand years ago!

What period of history would you want your children to be born into, with zero control over where or who they’d be born to? Just a random person on the earth on a date you choose, what would be your choice?

Re:To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it ... by ryandrake on Saturday May 30, 2026 @02:11PM (#48339101)
There is none, and that’s my point. Despite technological advances throughout history that made things easier to do and less scarce, over and over we keep the scarcity mindset and winner-takes-most economics around, funneling the majority of the value and benefits up to the few. At every point when some advancement could have greatly improved everyone’s lot in life, humanity chose to spread that improvement around to the masses as thinly as possible, just enough to avoid social upheaval, and shipped the rest of the value into the pockets of the richest 1%.
Re:To have a moral stance on AI is to be an outcast, and it ... by senordevnyc on Sunday May 31, 2026 @05:01AM (#48344123)
Nonsense. The median human is wildly better off than ever before.