Danish pension fund excludes SpaceX citing governance and valuation

Re:Danish pension fund excludes SpaceX citing governance and... by Tepix on Saturday May 30, 2026 @06:39AM (#48334765)

We know that xAI (with X) is struggling.

SpaceX is growing quite slowly. You could argue that Starship is likely to somewhat accelerate growth.

Starlink is doing well but also growing somewhat slow.

A more rational valuation would be 900b-1000b.

The rest is Musk and FOMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Danish pension fund excludes SpaceX citing governance and... by UltraSane on Saturday May 30, 2026 @07:26AM (#48335068)

Starship is currently a money pit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Danish pension fund excludes SpaceX citing governance and... by mavhc on Monday June 01, 2026 @03:10PM (#48361245)

SpaceX already dominates the global industry, there's barely anything left to grow into at current $/kg, but of course reducing $/kg by 10x means 10x more cargo to launch

[ Parent | on HN ]