GRAM is a lot like the Multiple Drafts Model of Consciousness that Daniel Dennett proposed. I think reasearches should read more philosophy models and bring good ideas into LLM research.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8
by notrealyme123 on Friday May 29, 2026 @08:07AM
(#48322078)
Can you recommend a good starting point other than Daniel Dennet?
I have the same assumption about Cognitive sciences, which I try to get a better understanding.
A LLM should be able to do a better survey of literature than me. I haven't read literature by Dennett but have watched ALL his videos online so that's how I know.
Yea this is great advice: the people who actually know how to build machine intelligence should go read the notes of the people who literally had no idea how to do it. While they are at it, we should have NASA go read Jules Verne so they can use his ideas in the next manned missions.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8
by onlyrealcuzzo on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:16AM
(#48321681)
> Where do I find papers like this?
I got it from my Google News recs on my phone, because I've been watching a bunch of videos on YouTube about LeCun's ideas on World Models and JEPA (I think).
Re:Claude Opus 4.8
by mike_hearn on Monday June 01, 2026 @05:00AM
(#48354294)
Emergent Mind is good:
I get their newsletter that summarizes the buzziest papers every day.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8
by notrealyme123 on Friday June 05, 2026 @03:15AM
(#48409088)
Much appreciated
Where do I find papers like this? Outside of hacker news comments. It's so hard to find the good stuff in all the noise IMO.