News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by willsmith72 on Friday May 29, 2026 @12:49AM (#48319181)
aren't you conflating being 10x as smart with code that is 10x more complicated?

the relationship should be the opposite, the smartest people can write the most readable solutions

Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by Zavora on Friday May 29, 2026 @04:43AM (#48320673)
4.8 is demonstrating simplicity, hence its smarter?? It just refactored my 4.6 generated code (4.8 is very slow on difficult tasks - urgh! - without burning tokens - yey!) but the output was wow! Simple, elegant and exactly what i wanted to see.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by IgorPartola on Friday May 29, 2026 @06:47AM (#48321450)
Maybe. I can’t imagine what kind of solutions a software engineer who is 10x smarter than any human who has ever lived would be like by definition. All I know is that there is a possibility it says that the most optimal way to solve a problem is too clever for me to understand and as long as I must verify its work I must be able to understand fully the code it writes.

Of course perhaps at that point I really do become more of a spec and prompt engineer and don’t actually look at the code any more than I look at the assembly code produced from my programs now. But still my gut says using hyperintelligence to do common tasks is all positive.

Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by ACCount37 on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:09AM (#48321629)
If you have an AI that's 10x smarter than any human who has ever lived, why would you be the one calling the shots? Kind of an issue with ASI.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by IgorPartola on Friday May 29, 2026 @08:58AM (#48322526)
Because my priorities and priorities of a non-human entity that is an order of magnitude master than anyone who has ever lived might not line up.