Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by overgard on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @05:37PM
(#48301088)
I keep hearing about this "inflection", but it feels extremely exaggerated to me. And yes, I was using it at the time. It got incrementally better, it wasn't that amazing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by simplyluke on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @05:45PM
(#48301183)
I think the bigger shift was harnesses and the two ended up somewhat commingled in people's minds.
Claude code was a lot of people's introduction to using coding agents that could do a lot more than copy-pasting from a chatbot or autocomplete.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by noman-land on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @05:46PM
(#48301195)
The tool usage + skills got markedly better and so did the thinking cohesion. Add 1m context windows and it was a very noticeable shift.
Opus 4.6 quality for local inference would be revolutionary.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by viking123 on Thursday May 28, 2026 @03:38AM
(#48305867)
1m context is garbage
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by nazgul17 on Thursday May 28, 2026 @07:40PM
(#48317074)
It's just a metric. If it can find a needle in a 1Mtok haystack, then it's likely good at coding within a 200Ktok context (or whatever, insert your number here, I'm just trying to make a point)