Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by aerhardt on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @03:14PM
(#48299063)
I like his other posts. He's bullish on AI, which is fine. I'd like to read a mix of bearish and bullish level-headed takes from people who are subject matter experts. His technical credentials are well past discussion - I love Django, and he comes across as a pretty upbeat but level-headed guy. Certainly beats radical takes in either direction from people who have no clue what they're talking about. It's just this article that I find rather confusing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by simonw on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @03:21PM
(#48299183)
The thing that matters most to me is if reading what I wrote teaches you some new things and gives you something useful to think about.
If I make an argument and you disagree that's fine with me, provided I didn't use misinformation or sloppy thinking in making that argument.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by aerhardt on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @03:48PM
(#48299572)
That's how I feel about most of your writing. I click through most times when I see you either on the front page or in the comments, and I generally walk away feeling like I have food for thought, without necessarily buying everything wholesale. It's part of why I keep coming back.
My root comment simply represented my two cents about the current post. I don't think anything about the post is outrageously incorrect or anything, just somewhat confusing. You're a very prolific contributor in this community and I don't think me or anyone else that welcomes your takes expects everything you write to rock our collective socks every single time, anyway.