Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by foobarchu on Tuesday May 26, 2026 @07:09PM
(#48287281)
I think the question was intended more as "what does PE have to do with Wikimedia", not "why is PE a problem".
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by benmusch on Tuesday May 26, 2026 @07:09PM
(#48287277)
and which part of this makes any sense at all when applied to the wikimedia foundation
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by mschuster91 on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @11:22AM
(#48295710)
their point, if I distill it correctly, is that Meehan comes with an agenda of enshittification. Given the events we're talking here... it's not that far-fetched.
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by benmusch on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @02:30PM
(#48298435)
ok and it's worth discussing on its merits. but "wikipedia is private equity" is a dumb thing to say and it matters to actually make concrete criticisms instead of throwing around buzzwords. the agenda of private equity is driven by profit incentives that make absolutely zero sense here.
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by mschuster91 on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @02:43PM
(#48298610)
> the agenda of private equity is driven by profit incentives that make absolutely zero sense here.
well, that also makes a bit of sense. like, why focus on cashing in from AI crap or on continuously expanding the cash bunker like a PE firm would, instead of actually investing money into coordinating with the communities when it comes to stuff like a new theme?
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by benmusch on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @05:54PM
(#48301285)
probably the same reason they put banners on the site asking for money
Re:Big tech's anti-labor playbook has come for Wikipedia
by AndrewKemendo on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @11:16PM
(#48304031)
Yeah nobody said Wikipedia is private equity so maybe read for comprehension
The person above you seemed to be able to figure it out without much issue
For depositors, this means you can't make money in the bank. And the stock markets gains look good on paper but inflation erases much of the real value. So people with giant pools of capital have learned to make their own fortunes by buying companies directly. This is "private equity."
Their playbook once they do so is limited to a few extractive techniques. They might buy a few leading competitors in an industry and merge them, double/triple the rates, and shutdown the associated 3rd party services "marketplace" and force people to buy only their services. Or start charging for API access that previously offered to all customers for free.
They might buy a service provider who charges reasonable rates, double/triple the rates, then sell them off again 14 months later.
They might buy a solvent company, saddle it with debt, and sell it off.
These private equity gains drive everyday costs for consumers like me. In a recent 24 months period, every monthly bill I pay went up $$$ as PE firms took over my service providers.
We could slow PE (and inflation in general) by raising interest rates, incentivizing deposits and increasing the cost of capital. But this would require national fiscal responsibility, and nobody wants that. Additionally, we could choose to bootstrap companies with sustainable multigeneration succession planning instead of sudden financialized cash outs. But after tirelessly building a company for a decade most founders would rather cash out so someone else can begin to abuse their customers. "I deserve this."