Re:California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verificatio...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday May 26, 2026 @07:15PM
(#48287324)
> the burden for coming up with a non-garbage policy should be on the people who fundamentally disagree with that framing
Things a good way to put it. Yes. Regardless of whether you disagree with that framing, that is the frame that’s been set and is being run with. So you can make theoretical arguments against the framing. Or practical arguments against the policies within the frame.
I'm certainly not busy trying to block a bunch of hypothetical policies that no one has proposed when there are garbage ones that are literally getting pushed right now. It sounds more like too many of the people who recognize the harm of this policy are too busy trying to claim that the burden for coming up with a non-garbage policy should be on the people who fundamentally disagree with that framing.