1k-year-old dingo bones show that it was injured, cared for, and ritually buried

Re:1k-year-old dingo bones show that it was injured, cared f... by dwroberts on Monday May 25, 2026 @09:32AM (#48266651)

What you’re quoting does not contradict their actual conclusion, which is the first paragraph I quoted

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1k-year-old dingo bones show that it was injured, cared f... by treis on Monday May 25, 2026 @10:23AM (#48267207)

Okay but I didn't say they didn't conclude that. I said:

>no evidence of burial and the evidence (mussel shells) that humans were involved with the site at all is thin

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1k-year-old dingo bones show that it was injured, cared f... by dwroberts on Monday May 25, 2026 @11:51AM (#48268261)

But you’re saying there’s no evidence of a burial and they explicitly state that it was deliberately buried, and there are multiple other factors that indicate human involvement

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1k-year-old dingo bones show that it was injured, cared f... by treis on Monday May 25, 2026 @12:16PM (#48268554)

Again, that there is no evidence of a burial and them explicitly stating that it was deliberately buried are not mutually contradictory things.

[ Parent | on HN ]