I wonder whether this usually is an oversight. The distinction of "mobile" seems rather vague at best.
London Mayor Boris Johnson has gangnam'd too: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/video/2012/oct/09/boris-j...
Here's a another one: http://opalang.org/gangnam.style.html
EDIT: Just curious, really, why the downvotes?
http://stevestreza.com/2012/09/08/so-i-made-a-mashup
Although the mixed audio alone is great, the video mixing was also fantastic. The whole thing was discussed here on HN:
I wonder if Youtube will reverse course on this, given that Psy has made it clear he has no interest in enforcing that copyright (a decision which is clearly in his best interest, too).
This is also why George Lucas got it so wrong in the past, when he sued his fans for expanding on his ideas. If anything the remixing Star Wars culture formed despite him, not because of him.
Indeed, that's one more reason to like this guy, PSY
"According to The Guardian, PSY has waived his copyright to the music video. Although this has not been officially confirmed, Arwa Mahdawi of The Guardian reported it was likely that PSY had simply refrained from taking legal action against parodies of his video. "Gangnam Style" is therefore a video that is "born to spawn"" [1]
The structure is always the same like taking some memorable moments of the video eg at the start the plane or the guy shaking his pelvis in the lift , then take some other stereotype or celebrities in it. So I actually wonder how many more views came from the parodies.
Last similar wave I remember was the "shit says " series maybe 6 months ago that had a similar formula.
here some examples:
Mitt Romney style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTs_TKk5S2M http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6830834/mitt-romney-style-...
Eastern Europe Style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY1MVQeeStY&list=UUFjCy-D...
Eton Style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaJl_qOVcf0