Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr...
by Retr0id on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:29PM
(#48225406)
Slop aside, do you think it's reasonable to assume a decent fraction of those making consistent profits are arbitrage bots?
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr...
by postflopclarity on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:54PM
(#48225767)
arbitrage is a rather overloaded word that people use for all kinds of strategies but yes, I predict most of the most profitable and consistent accounts are not actually attempting to forecast the outcome of these markets from first principles
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr...
by skybrian on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:33PM
(#48225458)
That sounds plausible. Not a trader so I wouldn't know. Saying at least a little about what's actually wrong with it seems more useful than just saying it's slop, which gives me very little info over just a downvote.
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr...
by postflopclarity on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:58PM
(#48225823)
it's pretty easy to write basic trading api connectivity. the hard part is knowing what trades to send
even if we are very charitable and assume the comment refers only to like high-engineering-effort infra for trying to be super competitive on latency, that's still like the opposite of a durable edge, since everybody is looking at it. there's very little "hidden" knowledge and it's mostly a matter of elbow grease and careful engineering.
I'm complaining because it's AI, and also slop.
> resolves into "cross-venue infrastructure" — which is also a more durable edge than within-venue alpha
anybody who actually trades knows that on these markets, "cross venue infrastructure" (aka vibe coding some exchange api integrations) is much less important / durable than actual alpha.