Re:AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
by Ensorceled on Thursday May 21, 2026 @10:18AM
(#48223040)
Worse, the constant AI scraping is actually costing content providers additional money for no return. At least Google/Bing/Yahoo scraping would then be used to provide links back to your content.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
by bolangi on Thursday May 21, 2026 @11:20AM
(#48224284)
Not only costing money. Constant AI scraping constitutes a denial-of-service attack that has brought down websites.
Re:AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
by fiedzia on Thursday May 21, 2026 @11:12AM
(#48224155)
> At least Google/Bing/Yahoo scraping would then be used to provide links back
That doesn't work anymore. Google provides AI generated summary, nobody looks at the original site.
Re:AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
by devsda on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:48PM
(#48225695)
How do you distinguish Google/MS scraping for Gemini/Copilot vs Google Search/Bing? In the case of Google, the UA is the same and you are entirely at their mercy to honor the Google-Extended instructions in robots.txt
Google has further complicated it with new search announcement blurring lines between regular search and AI search. And AI likes to not honor any licenses or instructions when it is hungry for training material.
It is once again an example of Google using its dominant position to abuse and promote cross functional products.