News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tracking Starbucks' 'widely recyclable' cups: none ended ... by bluGill on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @03:36PM (#48212964)
> Grand scheme of things, you'd do more "harm" to the planet (however minuscule on the personal level) by choosing not to recycle than choosing to recycle; a portion of it does get recycled in the end.

Are you sure? A garbage truck direct to the landfill is less energy than a garbage truck (for what isn't recycled), and a second truck to the sort facility, all the machines to sort, and then a truck to the landfill. Now if only Al goes on the recycling truck this is a clear win since recycled Al much less energy than mining new. However for many plastics the value is already questionable if it is recycled, and clearly worse if not. (I'm not sure about paper or glass)

Re:Tracking Starbucks' 'widely recyclable' cups: none ended ... by nozzlegear on Thursday May 21, 2026 @07:46PM (#48230173)
Good point! It'd be interesting to learn how that math ultimately shakes out for the average recycling plant.