Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t...
by nradov on Saturday May 16, 2026 @06:25PM
(#48164295)
They're not doing anything illegal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t...
by G0lg0thvn on Saturday May 16, 2026 @07:45PM
(#48164808)
Naive at best; Your statement doesn’t exclude greed as a driving factor. The legality of actions have nothing to do with the morality underlying them.
Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t...
by nradov on Saturday May 16, 2026 @08:47PM
(#48165138)
There's nothing immoral here. Shareholders aren't morally obligated to provide extra jobs for people who aren't adding value.
Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t...
by G0lg0thvn on Sunday May 17, 2026 @11:09PM
(#48175179)
Great strawman; keep trucking
I never said anything about obligation. Of course they’re not obliged to provide extra jobs, but it is a moral obligation to treat those whom you employ with dignity. I would love to understand what you actually define as a moral obligation considering your vacuous response.
Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t...
by nradov on Monday May 18, 2026 @12:05PM
(#48181639)
There's nothing undignified about terminating excess at-will employees.