US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed to AI

Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t... by nradov on Saturday May 16, 2026 @08:47PM (#48165138)

There's nothing immoral here. Shareholders aren't morally obligated to provide extra jobs for people who aren't adding value.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t... by G0lg0thvn on Sunday May 17, 2026 @11:09PM (#48175179)

Great strawman; keep trucking

I never said anything about obligation. Of course they’re not obliged to provide extra jobs, but it is a moral obligation to treat those whom you employ with dignity. I would love to understand what you actually define as a moral obligation considering your vacuous response.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t... by nradov on Monday May 18, 2026 @12:05PM (#48181639)

There's nothing undignified about terminating excess at-will employees.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US is starting to see heavy job losses in roles exposed t... by G0lg0thvn on Monday May 18, 2026 @07:46PM (#48187447)

Another great sidestep of actual discussion. A real master class in cowardice.

[ Parent | on HN ]