News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:O(x)Caml in Space by cmrdporcupine on Friday May 15, 2026 @01:53PM (#48151692)
Right, I always find these kinds of statements about "we can't find talent in <'weird' language X>" a bit confusing because I personally know all kinds of people always desperate to find work in neat-lang be it Haskell, OCaml, whatever... But the opportunities never seem to be there.

And it was only 3-4 years ago (maybe less) that Rust was considered by hiring managers to be in that category, too. Ask me how I know.

I'm going to assume it really means that they can't find people who satisfy some other constraint (location, pay band, "required" degree, experience on some other system or in some industry, etc) and OCaml or whatever.

In any case, LLMs blunt this. Hell, please stop me from opening a tab and starting a new OCaml project right now.

Re:O(x)Caml in Space by pjmlp on Friday May 15, 2026 @03:08PM (#48152562)
Because in general, when they get the candidates that could fit the position, they get grilled in meaningless letcode interviews, or classical stuff like how many golf balls fit into a plane.

The pool is already small, and gets reduced even further.

Re:O(x)Caml in Space by poulpy123 on Saturday May 16, 2026 @12:06AM (#48156720)
Probably because the requirement is not knowing ocaml but knowing how to do X, preferably in ocaml.