lol, its ridiculous to think this is happening, this is one of the stupidest things trump is saying

why? i want to understand this deeply please

If you taxed the rich and corporations like Europe does you could easily have social security. The rich in the US love making Europe the boogeyman that stole your social security, while they laugh all the way to the bank.

Is that really a narrative that people believe in? (that the EU “stole” the money that would otherwise go towards social security in the US)

wild

Some do:

U.S. Is Not a Piggy Bank for Europe’s Socialist Policies

https://waysandmeans.house.gov/2024/03/11/u-s-is-not-a-piggy...

Just like people believe the EU is subsiding the success of the US by its lack of military

Is it really false, though? I don't think the claim is that such benefits are directly subsidized, but indirectly. For example, the EU relies (relied?) heavily on the US military to be their "big stick", freeing up some portion of their budgets to be spent on social programs rather than defense ones.

I don't know how true that is in practice, but given the numbers on aid given to Ukraine, and the difference before Trump was elected, it seems true-ish.[1]

[1] https://www.kielinstitut.de/publications/news/ukraine-suppor...

but does EU really? EU has, even without the UK, the second biggest military in the world. Are we seriously saying that this is not enough to defend EU? if not, why not?

also, the numbers for ukraine support are not comparable like that, much of the money the EU gives ukraine are not "given", because the EU cannot just do that, they give them loans that they then later give up on (because EU is corrupt and likes to not follow own laws).

In addition to that, it is ridiculous to say that even ANY support to ukraine is needed to defend EU. Consider this, if EU really wanted to give it all, how much more could EU muster than what is currently given to ukraine? how could russia possibly hope to defeat EU?

so no, it is in fact not at all true

I dunno, but this hardly a convincing rebuttal. Can you provide some citations about loans and such? I believe the thing I linked included loans as part of the "aid given".

And I'm pretty sure Russia or China have the second biggest military in the world? So I'm not sure your stats are right, either?

The US also profited an exceptional amount from selling arms & software to Europe, far more than the US was spending on military aid to Europe, which was largely contingent on trust and friendly terms.

Over a decade or so the US is on course to lose far more than it's saving with these changing politics.

Europe wasn't giving anything away for free.

Europe will lose trillions trying to catch up from zero. Especially with a dwindling, aging population. Over decades you'll see.

Eh we're taxed for these things you know, you could have the same in the #1 economy and #1 power in the world if you didn't keep falling so hard for grifters and sociopath decades after decades but ok

Right. Now let us see what happens when European elites will move money from Wall Street to Europe back again.

Sure. Let's see what happens when Europe's population crashes while their pension obligations go up.

Plenty of time to deal with, much less when number doesn't go up anymore.