News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Building for the Future by deathanatos on Friday May 08, 2026 @12:59AM (#48058756)
> Out of 1,000 you hire, one could be an "attention all you need" research paper writer, who could set up the next stage of innovation which you'll completely miss if you do not get anyone.

I have worked with people of this caliber. The company did nothing to retain them, and the company did not retain them.

Every time. Without fail.

Re:Building for the Future by brabel on Friday May 08, 2026 @02:30AM (#48059395)
I am part of Management in my company. We explicitly maintain a list of key people in the company we don’t want to lose. The truth is that just a few people are what makes a company. Lose them and you are in trouble. Some companies don’t seem to understand that, but perhaps after a certain size, it doesn’t matter anymore! The machinery just keeps turning.
Re:Building for the Future by lordnacho on Friday May 08, 2026 @02:41AM (#48059490)
I met a guy this happened to. He got a special award within the company, asked for a bit of equity, didn't get it, in fact got blacklisted and booted out.

Luckily for him it worked out very very nicely.

Re:Building for the Future by Freedom2 on Friday May 08, 2026 @01:30AM (#48058950)
Well how can they have the time or resources to invest in retaining talent? They're busy hiring more interns, where one could be an "attention all you need" research paper writer, who could set up the next stage of innovation which you'll completely miss if you do not get anyone.
Re:Building for the Future by pjc50 on Friday May 08, 2026 @05:06AM (#48060579)
Yes. The intent is not to retain them or keep them happy, it's just to prevent them from doing inventive work for anyone else.