News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Slop Is Killing Online Communities by michaelt on Thursday May 07, 2026 @05:25PM (#48055285)
PGP’s web of trust was kinda bad privacy-wise in some regards, as it basically revealed your IRL social network.

If my PGP public key has 6 signatures and they’re all members of the East Manitoba Arch Linux User Group, you can probably work out pretty easily which Michael T I am.

Are there successful newer designs, which avoid this problem?

Re:AI Slop Is Killing Online Communities by pjc50 on Thursday May 07, 2026 @05:38PM (#48055459)
The IRL social network is actually the important part of the trust structure.

The only one of these I've seen that really worked was the Debian developer version: you had to meet another Debian developer IRL, prove your identity, and only then could you get the key signed and join the club.

Re:AI Slop Is Killing Online Communities by michaelt on Thursday May 07, 2026 @07:33PM (#48056507)
> The IRL social network is actually the important part of the trust structure.

For Debian-style applications that are 100% about openness and 0% about secrecy, sure.

But if you want to secure communications between pro-democracy activists in China, or you're a Snowden-like whistleblower wanting to securely communicate with journalists - y'all probably don't want to be vouching for one another's keys.

Re:AI Slop Is Killing Online Communities by 81AB24FB on Friday May 08, 2026 @02:07PM (#48066708)
I participate in developing anti-censorship tools. Chinese are a significant population, and it has some overlap with activists there. In practice, identity settles at "who controls this email address".

Self-signed PGP is very occasionally used to prove continuity across channels or addresses. Cross-signed basically never.

Re:AI Slop Is Killing Online Communities by LtWorf on Thursday May 07, 2026 @05:58PM (#48055685)
You need to meet 2 actually :)