What’s your contention? If the per capita incidences of either rich or poor people ruining families is a worse number, then what’s the implication?

That whatever group has a worse impact should be “gotten rid of”? What if poor people are worse? You’d abandon that line of thinking entirely, I imagine.

What’s next? If people with red cars are statistically more likely to commit crimes we should round them up as long as you don’t personally have a red car?