News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start now due to sea level. Parent comment

Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n... by otterley on Monday May 04, 2026 @07:59PM (#48016492)
Discussing climate change has never been banned; this sort of claim is easily disproved by even the most cursory of searches in the box below. Try it.

Here, I’ll say it right now: climate change is real, it has deleterious effects on our world, and we should take collective action to mitigate or even reverse it.

Now, there’s an expectation that commenters conduct themselves appropriately and contribute to the overall well being of this site. If a person misbehaves when discussing this or any topic, that’s when they get spanked.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n... by nielsbot on Monday May 04, 2026 @09:17PM (#48016932)
> de facto banned

seems a little strong, but I understand why they say this

> climate change is real, it has deleterious effects on our world, and we should take collective action to mitigate or even reverse it.

plenty of comments on HN to this day will disagree, saying climate change is some anti-progress conspiracy or hasn't been studied enough or won't be that bad, etc etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n... by otterley on Monday May 04, 2026 @11:42PM (#48017810)
It’s ok to disagree. Disagreement isn’t verboten here. In fact, I’ve been reading the book Unsettled by Stephen E. Koonin which calls into question the consensus on climate change and the author makes some great points.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n... by nielsbot on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @08:29PM (#48030634)
If the consensus is this lopsided I think it’s time to accept it. There are plenty of contrarian arguments, especially from oil companies who have a vested interest obviously) and they haven’t turned the consensus around despite their best efforts.

Also, due to the risks associated with climate change, doing something now as a societal insurance policy is prudent. Not to mention that polluters are necessarily infringing on the property and human rights of everyone else.

[ Parent | on HN ]