News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Security Through Obscurity Is Not Bad by pdpi on Sunday May 03, 2026 @08:36PM (#48003207)
We're in a technical forum, discussing a term of art that refers to a very specific bad practice.

Lucketone's argument is essentially saying that the bad practice itself isn't actually a bad practice by equivocating the term of art and the plain language definition.

Re:Security Through Obscurity Is Not Bad by strken on Sunday May 03, 2026 @09:52PM (#48003729)
The problem is that the term of art is confusing to technical people. See TFA. Technical people make logical leaps from "avoid security through obscurity [in the specific context of security systems which depend on obscurity and for which there are better alternatives than obscurity]" to "you should never obfuscate JavaScript" because the word is imprecise.
Re:Security Through Obscurity Is Not Bad by fsckboy on Monday May 04, 2026 @12:49AM (#48004766)
"security through obscurity" is not a term of art; it is not solely that property which RSA does not rely upon.