Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by andai on Sunday May 03, 2026 @06:25PM
(#48002242)
Self-improving system given enough time to self-improve doesn't beat non-self-improving system?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by dragonwriter on Sunday May 03, 2026 @07:51PM
(#48002881)
Humans are, each individually and aggregates collectively, self-improving systems.
Much moreso than modern AI systems are.
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by andai on Monday May 04, 2026 @04:50PM
(#48014784)
How do I individually and collectively increase my intelligence?
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by jonfw on Sunday May 03, 2026 @06:34PM
(#48002314)
Humans can certainly be self improving, both on an individual basis and in aggregate.
In humans, it seems that improvement in a new domain seems to follow a logarithmic scale.
Why wouldn’t this be the same for an AI?
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by thesmtsolver2 on Sunday May 03, 2026 @06:30PM
(#48002284)
Why are human doctors non-self improving?
If anything, using AI, they may improve more than before.
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by andai on Monday May 04, 2026 @04:51PM
(#48014805)
This seems to produce skill atrophy. "It's okay because the AI will pick up the slack" is kinda true but doesn't exactly strengthen the human position though.
Re:OpenAI's o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50...
by idiotsecant on Sunday May 03, 2026 @06:35PM
(#48002323)
Please show me this self improving AI.