News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by ak217 on Thursday April 30, 2026 @11:35PM (#47971059)
> Is a purely wind/solar + battery grid viable?

Yes.

(I don't disagree that a diverse mix is good, and I'm all for nuclear, I'm just saying the old "it's intermittent and can't grid form" boogeyman is no longer true. It would also really behoove Western countries to start manufacturing batteries at scale if we don't want to get a bloody nose in the future, because they're good for more than just the grid)

Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by idiotsecant on Friday May 01, 2026 @01:56AM (#47971664)
If it was viable it would have happened already. We have a massive oversupply of solar and wind, particularly on the west coast. Generation is the easy part.

We have terrible storage and transmission, the parts that are actually expensive.

Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by ben_w on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:14AM (#47972365)
> If it was viable it would have happened already.

It is happening, all over the world, with a persistent and rapid growth curve.

> We have terrible storage and transmission, the parts that are actually expensive.

Better cut those tariffs on cheap Chinese batteries (and aluminium for the transmission). Not that anyone would build one in the current political reality, but China produces enough aluminium that it would be viable to make a genuinely planet-spanning 1Ω power grid connecting your midwinter nights to someone else's midsummer days.

Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by idiotsecant on Friday May 01, 2026 @10:31AM (#47975230)
Viability is not just 'do the physical materials exist'. Building transmission in the US is almost entirely impossible at scale because he have no political will to do so and it's a regulatory nightmare. We can't just bury an entire mountain valley under 300 feet of water or evict a county of people to make room for a project like China can.

Ignoring the hard part and saying the aluminum exists is not even wrong, it's counterproductive. Until you solve the political component the materials might as well all be sitting on pallets in a warehouse, it doesn't help any.

Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by ben_w on Friday May 01, 2026 @10:57AM (#47975537)
Indeed; my example is intended to illustrate that the expense you experience isn't entirely necessary, but rather it is in a large part simply what America* chose.

* assuming I guessed the correct continent when you wrote "the west coast".

Re:Belgium stops decommissioning nuclear power plants by Moldoteck on Saturday May 02, 2026 @09:36AM (#47986290)
It's impossible for germany to have such a combo in any economical way.