Re:New 10 GbE USB adapters are cooler, smaller, cheaper
by Dylan16807 on Saturday April 25, 2026 @04:31PM
(#47904335)
The Ethernet version would have been much sillier than that. The megabaud rates for 10/100/1000 Ethernet are in fact 20, 125, and 125.
Re:New 10 GbE USB adapters are cooler, smaller, cheaper
by eqvinox on Sunday April 26, 2026 @04:03AM
(#47908358)
Yeah, it was a tongue-in-cheek comment. It's a shitshow, and I wish it'd backfire, but it won't. Maybe the EU will come up with some (better) "true labelling" laws, if not I see no chance for this to get better.
(Why the current laws don't cover this, I have no idea. It's technically false advertising.)
Previously to these standards promoted by Intel, the 1 Gb/s Ethernet used the same encoding and it was rightly called by everybody "1 Gb/s", not "1.25 Gb/s", because the gross bit rate has absolutely no importance for the users of a communication standard.
Only Intel invented this marketing trick, calling PCIe 1.0 and 2.0 as 2.5 and 5 Gb/s, instead of 2 and 4 Gb/s, and similarly for USB and SATA, where e.g. SATA 3 is called 6 Gb/s, but its speed is 4.8 Gb/s.