News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-5.5. Parent comment

Re:GPT-5.5 by elAhmo on Thursday April 23, 2026 @05:16PM (#47882157)
No one serious uses grok.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by ajdegol on Thursday April 23, 2026 @05:38PM (#47882432)
@grok is this true?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by NamlchakKhandro on Friday April 24, 2026 @01:15AM (#47885851)
no
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by for_i_in_range on Friday April 24, 2026 @09:27AM (#47889949)
This comment deserves more love
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by RALaBarge on Thursday April 23, 2026 @06:50PM (#47883255)
YMMV but Grok 4.1 Fast can usually find via static analysis a few things that other models dont seem to catch with the same prompt
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by d0gsg0w00f on Thursday April 23, 2026 @11:06PM (#47885002)
Why not? Honest question.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.5 by phillipcarter on Friday April 24, 2026 @12:27PM (#47892384)
Because the Grok models offer nothing different in serious contexts from the other leading models which don't come with a heaping pile of bad baggage.
[ Parent | on HN ]