RALaBarge

Ok then, I will continue to thank them and complimenting their shoes.

There are chains of trust which are established for SSL certs, centered around the idea that if we can believe Mozilla et al. that the server responding is who they claim they are. Up until now, that is good enough to establish the trust needed to accept the 2 keys in the connection are connected, and then a secure connection could be established to the host server.

Mozilla et al. could claim trust for Microsoft and then MS would be an intermediary for Mozilla. There is a long history of sketchy intermediaries like GoDaddy and others that root certificate providers like Mozilla would block at times due to abuse.

This leads to users, usually ones that are not that technically savvy, seeing 'insecure' warnings on a page that actually offers HTTP. ..but since the root servers no longer accept them as trusted, everything that GoDaddy supported, and every intermediary (child) cert which they approved would no longer be trusted and you would see a non-secure warning.

Creative accounting.

Yesterday in my CC there was an update that added a feature to auto compact immediately prior to the cache being invalidated.

You have to give credit where it is due: super intelligence is just straight up a better term. Broken clocks and all that…

Finally, someone who gets me!

A million SI monkeys on a million SI typewriters are bound to stumble upon some novel combination of words which could then have other context added and then it becomes an idea. Nature wins thanks to brute force as well and there are infinite novel combinations of words which may lead SI or us to further knowledge or study.

I wonder if they could be asked to make an initial request body which is the cypher for the code for sending to new nodes to maintain the vocab?

If you think that is bad, you should sample poverty.

I realized that AIs will need to keep us around much like we keep around an old DOS box running a specific program. There are so many analogue outputs in the real world that they still will not be able to take in as well as humans can.

Did they purchase the books legally? Is their plan to destroy every copy of every book ever, and if it were, would that even be possible?

This is an amazing looking website, I like it a lot.

Same for me, in about 1 in 10 or so, I’ll pop the shell and all in.

I ate Kiwis for years before someone told me most people DO NOT eat the skins. I looked at my bag of kiwis, and the even the damn monkey mascot was holding a spoon...mocking me...

Any skills, I just add into the tool itself. I then have the py tools in their PWD, don’t bother with mcp.

In the US, Business' are treated like people with free speech rights. If it would be cheaper for them in the long run to use ai and robots instead of humans, they will figure out a way to make it so.

Regardless of the imagination quandary, this second, RIGHT NOW is the worst these systems will ever be. They are only going to get better.

I've yet to really run mine since I dont have a great solution for the heat -- I hear it pulls 60w straight so it would be mega hot I presume.

best you can hope for is be one of the ones to turn off the lights

Assuming you had a 1:1 scale, what would be the difference between you taking a camera of an environment and measuring everything the same way vs. it being generated artificially in a 3d space?

Wouldn't the inputs be more or less the same wrt training a model with the synthetic data vs live video and the data captured there?

I ask DS4F to make a plan, then check it with grok/fable, build the code, check it with grok/fable, ship

The author mentions a few apps to control window positions. I use one called Rectangle, is there any benefit the other options might have that I am missing?

Most of these are your standard botnet rings. Either accounts directly are taken over, and the attacker adds 2FA or carding rings take stolen #s and attempt to add credits.

It is...incredible how many there are. Stripe does far too little in my opinion to help prevent issues like this, even though they have the business intelligence and enough data to do so.

I built a harness from scratch prior to trying any of the ones out there, so I knew how it work in a real way. I QUICKLY understood that the biggest issue with getting my shit done is that _my_ inputs are the untrusty ones. How many time do you hit backspace in a day?

Every plan and every code checkpoint finds me saying "Check with Grok and Fable latest to critique our strategy/code review" with pretty much every model. I havent ran into any deal breakers with the new Flash version yet (like it not running a tool properly or coming back with something completely daft)

Not them, but I payed 10 dollars to DeepSeek directly to use their Reasonix tool. I worked all weekend and the past few days, billions of tokens, I still have 3 bucks left!

Hey this looks good! Maybe consider adding a hover-over popup for the rectangles explaining what each thing means to a lay person. I see it at the bottom, but that is below the fold.

It’s just bonkers

Late, but it depends. Sometimes I ask for all of them to do the same thing and have a different model judge it, sometimes I ask for an orchestration model to run the smaller ones each on one task. I have a 'model cohort' where I run the same request across 5 very inexpensive models. Then have my driving LLM judge or synthesize.

You just come up with what you want in your head, and tell it to do it in that way and it does it. I trust 5 independent smartest programs ever over the SOTA smartest program's only.

No, pick a skill useful for humans in meat space. I hope you and yours survive the water wars