Re:Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy
by halhen on Thursday April 23, 2026 @10:38AM
(#47876290)
An interesting listen https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/171/ about money laundering and spam in streaming services
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy
by GorbachevyChase on Thursday April 23, 2026 @02:06PM
(#47879157)
I find that very believable. My completely unsubstantiated conspiracy theory is that OnlyFans is a money-laundering and dragnet-style-blackmail campaign for unlawful mass surveillance. I can’t imagine a normal or even abnormal person paying content makers, but I could imagine contractors and NGOs smurfing payments.
Re:Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy
by alsetmusic on Thursday April 23, 2026 @04:09PM
(#47881110)
I have a friend who pays (or at least paid) for cam shows. I don't understand it either because there's so much free content, but then you have cases like the guy who murdered his parents because he'd sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to a cam performer who he thought he was in love with.[0]
And of course it's a Florida Man. There's got to be something in the water over there
Re:Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy
by breakingcups on Friday April 24, 2026 @05:58AM
(#47887993)
> The Miami New Times claimed that freedom of information laws in Florida make it easier for journalists to acquire information about arrests from the police than in other states and that this is responsible for a large number of news articles.[3] A CNN article on the meme also suggested that the breadth of reports of bizarre activities is due to a confluence of factors, including public records laws giving journalists fast and easy access to police reports, the relatively high population of the state, its highly variable weather, and gaps in mental health funding.