News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker. Parent comment

Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @03:47PM (#47853619)
They provide plenty of evidence, all the time.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker by fph on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:00PM (#47853772)
How far down do you have to scroll on https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS to find a citation to a source for one of their claims?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:17PM (#47853989)
At the time of writing, I scrolled 4 posts down and found one. GrapheneOS are security researchers, so they often are a first party source. As for the attacks, they have plenty of evidence for their claims. They avoid giving any attacks more publicity, but they usually provide evidence if you ask.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker by fph on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @05:14AM (#47861035)
Please provide a link to this post you found, so I can tell which one you think is a citation to a source. If you want some examples of recent posts that should have a source but don't, here they are:

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442796907613215

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442754144530576

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439834987996043

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439798112845463

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439747793648606

(the linked post in Mastodon is the one displayed with a bigger font, not necessarily the first at the top of the page.)

[ Parent | on HN ]