Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:17PM
(#47853989)
At the time of writing, I scrolled 4 posts down and found one. GrapheneOS are security researchers, so they often are a first party source. As for the attacks, they have plenty of evidence for their claims. They avoid giving any attacks more publicity, but they usually provide evidence if you ask.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by fph on Wednesday April 22, 2026 @05:14AM
(#47861035)
Please provide a link to this post you found, so I can tell which one you think is a citation to a source. If you want some examples of recent posts that should have a source but don't, here they are:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442796907613215
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442754144530576
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439834987996043
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439798112845463
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439747793648606
(the linked post in Mastodon is the one displayed with a bigger font, not necessarily the first at the top of the page.)