Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by latable on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:51PM
(#47854352)
Exactly. It was a bold and necessary move to defend the users and the project. Some users got bricked OSes, but had he handed over the keys it would have put those users at risk and would have destroyed the credibility of the project.
Also, and as from what I understood from the GOS response he was not an employee of the company and had the ownership of his OS, and CopperOS would have been able to use their own signing keys but they never did which is strange, so even legally it looks like a "level-headed" response.
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by TommyTran732 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @08:01PM
(#47856624)
Important to note that users only stopped getting updates, the phones were not bricked and they can reinstall the OS signed with the new key.
CopperheadOS was always's Micay's project and used his own signing key. The key never belonged to Copperhead the company afaik.
It was not a disagreement about shares, it was a hostile takeover. Someone who never owned the project sought to steal it.