Re:Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed
by Gud on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @11:51AM
(#47850523)
There is a big difference between weed and tobacco.
I am a fairly regular weed smoker. I used to grow my own. I used to smoke tobacco. I can go weeks, months and even years without smoking weed. Kicking my nicotine habit took many, many, many tries and I didn't even enjoy it! They are not the same.
Re:Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed
by rcxdude on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:31PM
(#47851076)
That's a different in the harm, not a difference in the effectiveness of prohibition. In fact, the more addictive the substance, the less effective I would expected prohibition to be (and the more ancillary harms to result, especially from criminalisation).
Re:Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed
by cucumber3732842 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @11:45AM
(#47850434)
That's exactly what this is. The money has moved on to pouches and vapes.
It's like how everyone pat themselves on the back for banning child labor after the industrial revolution had rendered it obsolete outside a few niches that weren't economically important enough to put up a real fight.
Politicians "win" by pandering to voters and interests. So this is an obvious move since they can pander to all those people who grew up being told a cigarette takes a minute off your life while only pissing off some niche industry and a few smokers who are unwilling to vape.
This might play right into the hands of bootleggers and gangs but also into the Swedish / American nicotine pouch industry which is basically marketing straight at kids.
Also - vapes. Most folks don’t smoke cigarettes anymore. How does this control vaping?